Search results

You get $10k for a retainer yet?

You do know she created a new account to PM me after I ignored her messages, right? No, because that wasn't in her leaked logs.

I moderated? That I got kicked off three times and was barely on?

Retard: Hey, this irrelevant person is a minor. Judge: Evidence that she is, or he knew? Retard: Uhmmm....someone on the forums made a funny video.

No, I am not Allen. Let me clue in on something. The cases you see on google are appeals. You loose over 90% of them. Except I actually won one; Cossio v. Tourtelot 17-1653. There are lawyers that go their whole career without an appeal win. Now eventually, years later that was dismissed...

Unfortunately there's going to be little discussion about that. While I do mention the fact that I was oblivious to a minor being let in the discord, and is still in the discord, the amended complaint focuses on; Bitcoin "scammer", "stolen valor", and breach of contract. I don't need to talk...

No, I don't want to go to court over this. But a deal is a deal.

Just saw that, thanks.

Oh, and she has been admitted in the State bar of Illinois.

A Pakistani one?

That breach of contract was not on this issue, as evidence that I did not put your name on it and I am not psychic. But I did plan on adding you if you reneged on this deal. Nothing about that is "entrapment" nor underhanded. Yes, it's clear that you never were;

LMFAO. Keep digging that hole. Also entrapment is specifically criminal, and no it would not be entrapment. Your statements in the above posts. You reneging on the deal with Ben. Which did not name or directly involve you. It was a completely different issue as I said ad nauseum. I am...

And then you reverted the article in retaliation. Thanks.

No he did not. 1. He has admitted that he intended to comply once, and have Tabs or someone else revert his changes and claim he "did his part". 2. He just admitted that no deal was "signed" so he did not have to comply. That's a big error on his part. As I am sure he now understands...

No, you were never going to honor the agreement. You did not find out about the lawsuit until I told you after you ignored my messages. And as explained, the lawsuit did not mention you or this issue at all. Even if it did, you still are in breach, so your retroactive defense fails. You...

Yes? https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/sign-dm-enforceability-text-message-agreements-2021-08-04/ I mean, why wouldn't a message over email or DMs not be considered binding if handshake agreements are? "among other things...." Please note, nobody has ever accused you of being...

>transfers domain >Please honor the deal >lol, there was no contract because I did not sign anything! I'm not doing anything anymore for you, stop stirring the pot and take it. Yeah, not so frivolous. Among other things, the article said I was a bitcoin scammer. You previously said you did...

He's a tad retarded. And now he's stealing Assblonker's Shtick and typing in all caps.

You keep saying that. Along with this; I am, but you people are not.

No, no, no. I'm suing you for being a liar and not doing what you promised to do.