Personal information exposure warning

[VideoGamePhenom]

Nobody wants to consider it. No one. That goes for everybody. There are a ton of peacemakers out there who plan on intervening in an effort to overthrow ED, especially since you're pressuring people to kill themselves. No matter how much pressure you put on these innocent people, they are NOT going ANYWHERE!

 

[lurk]

what's wrong? did your jimmies get russled? the truth is that the more of something that exists the less value it has, what does this say about humans?

 

[SuperChongus]

Nobody wants to consider it. No one. That goes for everybody. There are a ton of peacemakers out there who plan on intervening in an effort to overthrow ED, especially since you're pressuring people to kill themselves. No matter how much pressure you put on these innocent people, they are NOT going ANYWHERE!

So because you didn't get your way on a site who wrote some "mean" stuff about you, you decide it's a great idea to keep posting on said site?
Have you not realized each time you write, you just draw more negative attention to yourself?

A definition of insanity: doing the same shit over and over expecting something different. (you)

 

[VideoGamePhenom]

You'd probably be aware, that more complaints about this site have already been filed to the FBI. And a petition on change.org is in place that would boost the chances of ED being off the internet. Just exposing personal information on a satire site simply has ABSOLUTELY NO place on the internet or anywhere in our society.

 

[Lovecraft]

MY MICRO- IS TOP SECRET!

 

[lurk]

You'd probably be aware, that more complaints about this site have already been filed to the FBI. And a petition on change.org is in place that would boost the chances of ED being off the internet. Just exposing personal information on a satire site simply has ABSOLUTELY NO place on the internet or anywhere in our society.

oh my god! these are serious allegations! where can i go sign your expired change.org petition?! we must make sure these crimes against humanity cant continue!

 

[VideoGamePhenom]

Regarding what this site does and how it allows people's personal information to be leaked or exposed, those ARE your crimes against humanity, and that we cannot allow to continue.

 

[lurk]

Regarding what this site does and how it allows people's personal information to be leaked or exposed, those ARE your crimes against humanity, and that we cannot allow to continue.

you're right! we cant let this evil continue, brothers and sisters! we all need to gather together and sign this guy's expired change.org petition right away! together as one we can make a difference in the world!

 

[Illuminati 2.0]

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

 

[GirlOnInternet]

I love cock

 

[Baka]

what the fuck is that thing on his lip? it looks like raw irritated skin in the shape of a mustache. seriously it's freaking me out

 

[Sleepy]

what the fuck is that thing on his lip? it looks like raw irritated skin in the shape of a mustache. seriously it's freaking me out
View attachment 81521

it looks like he shaved without shaving cream or the razor he was using was just dull as fuck

 

[Baka]

it looks like he shaved without shaving cream or the razor he was using was just dull as fuck

Probably one of those one blade razors that was already 90% rust

 

[GirlOnInternet]

what the fuck is that thing on his lip? it looks like raw irritated skin in the shape of a mustache. seriously it's freaking me out
View attachment 81521

allergic reaction to niggercum

 

[SuperChongus]

just looks like fag can't grow hair for shit
and had a fake stache tattooed on.

the down syndrome eyes don't help either

 

[VideoGamePhenom]

Exposing pictures stolen from external sources is against the law. There is no evidence that the person in real life has down syndrome. It's just a stolen photo, that's all there is.

 

[benos]

You're a dope.

 

[GirlOnInternet]

Exposing pictures stolen from external sources is against the law. There is no evidence that the person in real life has down syndrome. It's just a stolen photo, that's all there is.

Suck my dick.

 

[SuperChongus]

Exposing pictures stolen from external sources is against the law. There is no evidence that the person in real life has down syndrome. It's just a stolen photo, that's all there is.

it's not stolen if you uploaded it to the public internet.
i am now reporting you to the fbi for making false accusations, soliciting minors and copyright violation.

 

[lurk]

Exposing pictures stolen from external sources is against the law. There is no evidence that the person in real life has down syndrome. It's just a stolen photo, that's all there is.

we must secure the existence of copyrighted ships and a future for mary sue OCs!

 

[VideoGamePhenom]

It's not stolen if you uploaded it to the public internet.
I am now reporting you to the FBI for making false accusations, soliciting minors and copyright violation.

Even if was a "public internet", the photos can still be considered stolen if ever pirated without the original owner's permission. And even if you're "framing" someone for performing solicitation on minors or anything else, you just might get in trouble for committing conspiracy to get someone else in trouble.

 

[benos]

You're a dope.

 

[SuperChongus]

Even if was a "public internet", the photos can still be considered stolen if ever pirated without the original owner's permission. And even if you're "framing" someone for performing solicitation on minors or anything else, you just might get in trouble for committing conspiracy to get someone else in trouble.

nice law degree that you don't have

 

[leckerkeks]

Even if was a "public internet", the photos can still be considered stolen if ever pirated without the original owner's permission. And even if you're "framing" someone for performing solicitation on minors or anything else, you just might get in trouble for committing conspiracy to get someone else in trouble.

my lawyer friend explains this stuff, i kinda nerd out over it. if you have a tort, one of the first things that is established in the complaint is jurisdiction. things are very open to getting thrown out before they even start. for example, where did the damage occur? what state (i.e. country)? what are the laws governing this? will it be remanded elsewhere? maybe it's international with no jurisdiction, or somewhere you don't have access to legal system. how is that established? what are the facts of business operations? where is the nexus?

if you try and lolsuit someone that's from another place, they can fight to have it moved to a better venue more favorable to their case. or tossed completely. good example he used is these megatech faggo-corps like Samsung that do very, very generous donations to a small Texas city/county, where they also push to have their claims adjudicated (venue changed). because who's gonna rule against their sugar daddy, right.

but--if you wanna do this the good old fashioned Burger freedomland way, it'll cost you. hypothetically, let's just say, someone ran their mouth off and kept harassing me on my property. i file a looooooolsuit for the diminished value of my property. sure it cost a few thousand, but now hypothetical shitheel is facing poverty plus a five figure suit. all on top of several thousand more in legal fees, while enduring daily smug glares and mounting regret. best of all, it's completely as American as apple pie or exploding a-rab hospitals for Jerusalem.

satisfaction can be all yours, my friend for the low low introductory price of maybe three to four-ish grand.

 

[portia]

Even if was a "public internet", the photos can still be considered stolen if ever pirated without the original owner's permission. And even if you're "framing" someone for performing solicitation on minors or anything else, you just might get in trouble for committing conspiracy to get someone else in trouble.

Conspiracy is just friends making plans.

 

[GirlOnInternet]

Even if was a "public internet", the photos can still be considered stolen if ever pirated without the original owner's permission. And even if you're "framing" someone for performing solicitation on minors or anything else, you just might get in trouble for committing conspiracy to get someone else in trouble.

This sounds like you're making excuses to explain any logs that surface of you sexting minors.

 

[VideoGamePhenom]

This sounds like you're making excuses to explain any logs that surface of you sexting minors.

I molest children. I molest children so hard.

 

[SuperChongus]

 

[VideoGamePhenom]

Whoever modified my recent post is an absolute gut-wrencher. Modifying anyone's post like that is NOT allowed, and there is no way anyone has proof of molesting any minors of any kind. HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

 

[SuperChongus]

Whoever modified my recent post is an absolute gut-wrencher. Modifying anyone's post like that is NOT allowed, and there is no way anyone has proof of molesting any minors of any kind.

not allowed by what rule